Evidence
What corrective-action and verification evidence existed.
Inspect whether the record behind CAPA closure makes the evidence, judgment, risk, and authorization visible—before an investigator asks your team to reconstruct the decision.
A reviewer must be able to see what corrective-action and verification evidence existed, how effectiveness was evaluated, what residual risk or uncertainty remained, and who authorized the conclusion.
What corrective-action and verification evidence existed.
How effectiveness was evaluated against stated criteria.
What residual risk, uncertainty, or recurrence exposure remained.
Who accepted the effectiveness conclusion and why.
A CAPA plan, completion evidence, and closure signature can all exist while the reason for accepting effectiveness remains distributed, incomplete, or dependent on later reconstruction.
Can the team show how effectiveness was determined when an investigator asks?
Can leadership show that corrective action addressed the actual root cause—not only the observed event?
Can the organization show who accepted the effectiveness conclusion and what evidence supported that authority?
The preview now begins with the actual Executive Case File interface—including the left-hand decision path that organizes the artifact—then lets you inspect selected Evidence, Judgment, Risk, and Authorization content.
Use the Case File to pressure-test whether your closure records would let an independent reviewer reconstruct the decision without relying on memory, assumptions, or scattered documentation.
A completed, scenario-specific decision record showing the evidence, judgment, risk, and authorization behind a defensible CAPA effectiveness conclusion.